Clay vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UXDA (4.2/5) edges ahead of Clay (4.0/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a firm exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. Clay is the stronger option for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | 25+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best for | B2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list. | Banks and fintech companies wanting a firm exclusively focused on financial-services UX. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, retainer |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech |
Clay vs UXDA: overview
Clay
Clay (clay.global) operates out of San Francisco with substantial NYC client history. No founding year is published, so it's tagged here as unconfirmed; team size is likewise not independently verifiable — best treated as boutique-to-mid-size. Its roster — Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, Samsung — reflects deep B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech experience. This is the design firm at clay.global, distinct from the unrelated AI sales-data company also named Clay (clay.com).
UXDA
Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda launched UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015, based in Riga, Latvia with a 25+ multidisciplinary team. Over a decade, the firm has defined or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries — an exclusively financial-services focus that makes it the clearest fintech specialist in this list.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs UXDA
| Capability | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Criterion | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Dimension | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon) is exceptional for a boutique-to-mid-size firm |
| + | Deep, specific track record across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design |
| + | San Francisco base with strong NYC client relationships |
| + | Combines UX design, branding, and web/product design under one roof |
| - | Founding year is not independently confirmed outside the company's own materials |
| - | Team size is neither published nor independently verifiable, complicating capacity planning for large programs |
| - | Easily confused with the unrelated AI company Clay (clay.com) — confirm you're researching clay.global |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist firms simply can't match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time |
| - | The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques |
| - | Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
Who should choose Clay?
Clay is the right choice for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list..
A client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack) unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose UXDA?
UXDA is the right choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a firm exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
The only firm in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Clay vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Clay (Not published) vs UXDA ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Clay |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs UXDA
| Use case | Clay fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs UXDA
UXDA (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only firm in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. It is best for banks and fintech companies wanting a firm exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
Clay (4.0/5) is the better choice when b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list.. If your situation matches those criteria, Clay is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs UXDA FAQ
Is Clay better than UXDA?
UXDA (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay is better for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique with a big-tech-caliber client list.. UXDA is better for banks and fintech companies wanting a firm exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
How do Clay and UXDA differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or UXDA?
UXDA is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and UXDA?
Clay's primary differentiator is: a client list (coinbase, uber, meta, google, slack) unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only firm in this list exclusively focused on financial services ux, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs 25+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.