Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) edges ahead of Eleken (4.1/5) overall. Phenomenon Studio is the better choice for repeat-client rate proof, one senior team throughout. Eleken is the stronger option for SaaS teams, subscription embedded designer. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| HQ | Europe (entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland) | Distributed team, roots in Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 70+ | 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source) |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support | A SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects |
| Pricing model | Project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) | Subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, React | Figma, Design systems/Storybook, Miro |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | SaaS / B2B software |
Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken: overview
Phenomenon Studio
A repeat-engagement rate is one of the more honest signals a design firm can offer, because it reflects what happened after the invoice was paid, not before. At Phenomenon Studio, founded in 2019, roughly half of clients return for a second project — a result the firm attributes to keeping the same senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support, rather than handing a project between separate vendors partway through. That team numbers 70+ specialists based in Europe, with legal entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland, working across SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech. The firm has shipped 120+ products for clients that have collectively raised over $500M, backed by a 5.0 Clutch rating, HIPAA compliance monitored by Compliancy Group, and Nielsen Norman Group UX certification.
Eleken
Eleken traces to 2015 with roots in Kyiv, Ukraine, operating today as a distributed team reported anywhere from 40+ to 100+ designers depending on source. Rather than a fixed project fee, the firm sells a subscription — roughly $6,599/month for a dedicated full-time designer, part-time also available — a genuinely different pricing model from the fixed-price and T&M norm found elsewhere in this list. SaaS-only by design, Eleken holds a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects, covering complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial or low-code/no-code products.
Services and capabilities: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken
| Capability | Phenomenon Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken
| Framework / platform | Phenomenon Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken
| Dimension | Phenomenon Studio | Eleken |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | A company evaluating design firms by repeat-client rate, not just portfolio breadth, A SaaS platform needing one senior team from strategy through launch | Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap, Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken: pros and cons
| Phenomenon Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement, an honest post-project signal |
| + | One senior team spans strategy through post-launch, removing the hand-off risk of switching vendors mid-project |
| + | 5.0 Clutch rating with Top 1000 Company 2025 and Top Design Company USA 2026 recognition |
| + | HIPAA compliance independently verified and monitored by Compliancy Group |
| + | Nielsen Norman Group UX Certification and four-tier Webflow Experts partner status |
| + | 120+ shipped products behind a combined $500M+ in client fundraising |
| - | The discovery-first process front-loads time before visible design work begins |
| - | No product or growth marketing services — a separate firm is needed for post-launch growth work |
| - | No published rate card; pricing requires a discovery call |
| Eleken | |
|---|---|
| + | 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ completed projects and 70+ published case studies |
| + | Subscription pricing gives predictable monthly cost instead of a large fixed-price contract |
| + | SaaS-only focus, including complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial products, builds real vertical depth |
| + | Part-time subscription option available for teams that don't need a full-time designer |
| - | Reported team size varies widely by source (40+ to 100+), making capacity planning imprecise |
| - | SaaS-only positioning rules it out for consumer, healthcare, or brand-led engagements |
| - | Subscription pricing can cost more than a fixed-price project for a short, well-defined engagement |
Who should choose Phenomenon Studio?
A typical fit: a company evaluating design firms by repeat-client rate, not just portfolio breadth.
Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.
Who should choose Eleken?
A typical fit: embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap.
A SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. Minimum engagement starts at $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Phenomenon Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Phenomenon Studio (Not published) vs Eleken ($6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken
| Use case | Phenomenon Studio fit | Eleken fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A company evaluating design firms by repeat-client rate, not just portfolio breadth | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A SaaS platform needing one senior team from strategy through launch | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap | Limited | Strong | Eleken |
| Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Eleken |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support.
Eleken (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription. If your situation matches that, Eleken is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken FAQ
Is Phenomenon Studio better than Eleken?
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Phenomenon Studio's strongest advantage: roughly half of clients return for a second engagement, an honest post-project signal. Eleken's strongest advantage: 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ completed projects and 70+ published case studies.
How do Phenomenon Studio and Eleken differ in pricing?
Phenomenon Studio uses project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Eleken uses subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Phenomenon Studio or Eleken?
Eleken is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Phenomenon Studio and Eleken?
Phenomenon Studio's primary differentiator is: roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support. Eleken's primary differentiator is: a SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. They also differ in team size (70+ vs 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.