SPCSHP
Founded as Big Spaceship in 2000; MSQ owns it now, under a new name.
Founded 2000 | Brooklyn, NY, USA | Not published (historically ~50+) employees
product-designbrandingweb-designmotion-design
What is SPCSHP?
Michael Lebowitz founded Big Spaceship in Brooklyn in 2000, building a creative digital firm known for early-2000s work with JetBlue, YouTube, Samsung Galaxy, BMW, and NBC. UK marketing group MSQ acquired the firm in October 2024, and it now operates under the name SPCSHP — a rebrand recent enough that some case studies and press still reference the original name. The firm's roots are in interactive creative and brand storytelling rather than pure enterprise product design, a lineage that still shows in its client work.
SPCSHP works primarily with clients in Consumer products, Media & entertainment, Enterprise transformation sectors. Its primary differentiator is: A quarter-century of creative digital work (JetBlue, YouTube, Samsung, BMW) under a 2024 rebrand from Big Spaceship to SPCSHP, now backed by MSQ.
SPCSHP tech stack and services
FigmaAdobe Creative SuiteReactAfter Effects
| Service area |
|---|
| Product Design |
| Branding |
| Web Design |
| Motion Design |
SPCSHP pricing
Short answer: SPCSHP uses a project-based (not published) pricing approach. Minimum engagement starts at Not published.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From Not published | Well-defined scope |
| Retainer | Monthly rate; not public | Ongoing AI engineering |
SPCSHP does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
SPCSHP pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +A quarter-century of continuous operation since its 2000 founding as Big Spaceship | -Rebranded from Big Spaceship to SPCSHP in 2024 — recent enough that some public case studies and reviews still reference the old name |
| +Named client work spans JetBlue, YouTube, Samsung Galaxy, BMW, GE, Microsoft, and Google | -Acquired by MSQ in 2024, so clients are hiring into a larger network rather than an independent studio |
| +MSQ backing since October 2024 provides access to a larger marketing and creative network | -Team size isn't published in current sources, making capacity planning harder without a direct conversation |
| +Creative-and-brand-storytelling roots differentiate it from purely process-driven enterprise design firms |
SPCSHP vs alternatives
How SPCSHP compares to the other top Product Design firms.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenomenon Studio | Repeat-client rate proof, one senior team throughout. | Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| IDEO | Enterprises, multi-year, multi-business-unit transformation. | The firm whose 1991 formation is most credited with establishing human-centered design as a formal discipline, still running roughly 24 studios worldwide | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Frog | Enterprises needing digital plus physical/hardware design. | Still designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) alongside software, inside Capgemini Invent's enterprise consulting scale | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| R/GA | Large brands, product design plus brand strategy. | Fuses product design with marketing and brand strategy for large platforms, now independently owned for the first time in over two decades | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Accenture Song | Regulated enterprises, design within tech transformation. | 36 studios and 2,000+ specialists operating inside Accenture — the largest global footprint and compliance coverage in this list | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Work & Co | Premium brands, design plus production-grade engineering. | A client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) that outpaces its ~425-person headcount, delivered through an engineering-heavy design-and-build model | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Huge Inc | Large brands, big firm mid-ownership-transition. | One of the largest, longest-running digital firms in this list, now merged with Hero Digital under AEA Investors | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| MetaLab | Funded SaaS/fintech, full-stack research-to-systems. | A Slack/Uber/Coinbase/Midjourney-caliber portfolio built by a 160-person firm, delivered full-stack from research through design systems | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| SYPartners | Large orgs, design within culture/strategy transformation. | A transformation consultancy — not a pure product-design shop — with a client list (Obama Foundation, Starbucks, IBM, Airbnb) most boutiques on this list can't approach | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Ramotion | Startups/mid-market, brand identity plus product design. | Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Projects by IF | Tech/public-sector, trust- and policy-aware design. | A design practice built specifically around trust, regulation, and policy work for technology-enabled organizations, with clients spanning Google to the UK Government | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Fireart Studio | Startups/mid-market, design plus full development. | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Qubstudio | Fintech, logistics, healthcare — MVP to enterprise redesign. | Currently Clutch's #1-ranked UX/UI firm worldwide for 2026, with Red Dot Design Award recognition layered on top | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Excited | SaaS/fintech teams, top-ranked specialist, accessible rates. | A sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Gapsy Studio | Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — perfect-rated boutique. | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a firm that doesn't publish its own headcount | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Goji Labs | Startups, entrepreneurs, nonprofits — strategy-led, accessible. | A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only funded startups | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Eleken | SaaS teams, subscription embedded designer. | A SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| UXDA | Banks/fintech, exclusively financial-services UX. | The only firm in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Onething Design | Multi-vertical companies, one firm across five industries. | Covers five distinct industries — BFSI, consumer, enterprise, healthcare, automotive — from one team with both US and India delivery presence | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| UX studio | B2B SaaS, research-first before UI. | A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Halo Lab | E-commerce/web-app teams, #1 Dribbble-ranked firm. | Currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Momentum Design Lab | Clients wanting a long-tenured Silicon Valley firm. | Nearly a quarter-century of continuous operation, one of the oldest firms in this list by founding date | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Spaceberry Studio | Budget-conscious SaaS/AI/mobile teams, low-commitment subscription. | One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| The Gradient | Fintech, healthcare, retail — AI-native, limited roster. | A deliberately small, AI-native firm with a notable client list (Qatar Airways, Philips, Daimler AG) unusual for its self-limited scale | 4.2 | Full comparison |
SPCSHP FAQ
What is SPCSHP?
Founded as Big Spaceship in 2000; MSQ owns it now, under a new name.
How much does SPCSHP charge?
SPCSHP uses project-based (not published) pricing. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does SPCSHP use?
SPCSHP works with Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, React, After Effects. Primary industries served include Consumer products, Media & entertainment, Enterprise transformation.
Is SPCSHP right for enterprise?
Consumer brands, design plus creative storytelling. Not published (historically ~50+) team size. Key consideration: Rebranded from Big Spaceship to SPCSHP in 2024 — recent enough that some public case studies and reviews still reference the old name.
What are the best SPCSHP alternatives?
The best alternatives to SPCSHP depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Phenomenon Studio: roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support
- IDEO: the firm whose 1991 formation is most credited with establishing human-centered design as a formal discipline, still running roughly 24 studios worldwide
- Frog: still designs physical hardware (iot, automotive, medical devices) alongside software, inside capgemini invent's enterprise consulting scale
Compare SPCSHP with other Product Design firms
SPCSHP vs Phenomenon Studio SPCSHP vs IDEO SPCSHP vs Frog SPCSHP vs R/GA SPCSHP vs Accenture Song SPCSHP vs Work & Co SPCSHP vs Huge Inc SPCSHP vs MetaLab SPCSHP vs SYPartners SPCSHP vs Ramotion SPCSHP vs Projects by IF SPCSHP vs Fireart Studio SPCSHP vs Qubstudio SPCSHP vs Excited SPCSHP vs Gapsy Studio SPCSHP vs Goji Labs SPCSHP vs Eleken SPCSHP vs UXDA SPCSHP vs Onething Design SPCSHP vs UX studio SPCSHP vs Halo Lab SPCSHP vs Momentum Design Lab SPCSHP vs Spaceberry Studio SPCSHP vs The Gradient
Verify all details directly with SPCSHP before making a decision.