Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) edges ahead of Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) overall. Phenomenon Studio is the better choice for repeat-client rate proof, one senior team throughout. Gapsy Studio is the stronger option for Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — perfect-rated boutique. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
| HQ | Europe (entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland) | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | 70+ | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a firm that doesn't publish its own headcount |
| Pricing model | Project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, React | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Phenomenon Studio
A repeat-engagement rate is one of the more honest signals a design firm can offer, because it reflects what happened after the invoice was paid, not before. At Phenomenon Studio, founded in 2019, roughly half of clients return for a second project — a result the firm attributes to keeping the same senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support, rather than handing a project between separate vendors partway through. That team numbers 70+ specialists based in Europe, with legal entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland, working across SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech. The firm has shipped 120+ products for clients that have collectively raised over $500M, backed by a 5.0 Clutch rating, HIPAA compliance monitored by Compliancy Group, and Nielsen Norman Group UX certification.
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes its own history as running "since 2014" — treated here as self-reported since it isn't independently confirmed — from Dnipro, Ukraine. Instead of a headcount, the firm calls itself a "collective of creative professionals," pointing to 500+ completed projects and a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews. Thirteen-plus international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush back that rating, spanning fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail work.
Services and capabilities: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Phenomenon Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Phenomenon Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Phenomenon Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A company evaluating design firms by repeat-client rate, not just portfolio breadth, A SaaS platform needing one senior team from strategy through launch | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Phenomenon Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement, an honest post-project signal |
| + | One senior team spans strategy through post-launch, removing the hand-off risk of switching vendors mid-project |
| + | 5.0 Clutch rating with Top 1000 Company 2025 and Top Design Company USA 2026 recognition |
| + | HIPAA compliance independently verified and monitored by Compliancy Group |
| + | Nielsen Norman Group UX Certification and four-tier Webflow Experts partner status |
| + | 120+ shipped products behind a combined $500M+ in client fundraising |
| - | The discovery-first process front-loads time before visible design work begins |
| - | No product or growth marketing services — a separate firm is needed for post-launch growth work |
| - | No published rate card; pricing requires a discovery call |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
Who should choose Phenomenon Studio?
A typical fit: a company evaluating design firms by repeat-client rate, not just portfolio breadth.
Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
A typical fit: fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work.
A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a firm that doesn't publish its own headcount. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Phenomenon Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Phenomenon Studio (Not published) vs Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Phenomenon Studio fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A company evaluating design firms by repeat-client rate, not just portfolio breadth | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A SaaS platform needing one senior team from strategy through launch | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support.
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is worth a look if you need healthcare or EdTech product redesign. If your situation matches that, Gapsy Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Phenomenon Studio vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Phenomenon Studio better than Gapsy Studio?
Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Phenomenon Studio's strongest advantage: roughly half of clients return for a second engagement, an honest post-project signal. Gapsy Studio's strongest advantage: 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list.
How do Phenomenon Studio and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Phenomenon Studio uses project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Phenomenon Studio or Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Phenomenon Studio and Gapsy Studio?
Phenomenon Studio's primary differentiator is: roughly half of clients return for a second engagement — a repeat-business rate the firm attributes to keeping one senior team across strategy, design, development, and post-launch support. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a firm that doesn't publish its own headcount. They also differ in team size (70+ vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.