Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) edges ahead of Projects by IF (4.0/5) overall. Fireart Studio is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, design plus full development. Projects by IF is the stronger option for Tech/public-sector, trust- and policy-aware design. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Projects by IF | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| HQ | London, UK | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) |
| Team size | Not published | 100–150+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A design practice built specifically around trust, regulation, and policy work for technology-enabled organizations, with clients spanning Google to the UK Government | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition |
| Pricing model | Project-based (not published) | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Miro, Adobe Creative Suite | Figma, React, Next.js |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio: overview
Projects by IF
Sarah Gold founded Projects by IF in London in 2016, building a strategic design practice around a specific problem: helping technology-enabled organizations design for trust at scale. That focus — spanning product and experience design, digital strategy, regulation and policy work, and technology architecture — has produced client relationships with Google, the UK Government, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, an unusual combination of big tech and public-sector work for a studio this size.
Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio's story begins in Ukraine in 2013 and continues today from Warsaw, Poland, growing from a single founder to 150+ people across a decade. Clutch names it a "Leading UX Design Team"; DesignRush and The Manifest have separately called it a Top Graphic Design Company. Underneath those labels sits a genuine track record: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, with product design and full software development inside the same boutique firm.
Services and capabilities: Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio
| Capability | Projects by IF | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio
| Framework / platform | Projects by IF | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio
| Criterion | Projects by IF | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio
| Dimension | Projects by IF | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Public-sector or government digital service design, Trust-and-safety product design for a technology platform | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio: pros and cons
| Projects by IF | |
|---|---|
| + | Purpose-built around trust and regulation-aware design, a genuine specialty few boutiques on this list offer |
| + | Client list combines big tech (Google) with public-sector work (UK Government), demonstrating range within its niche |
| + | Founder-led since 2016 under CEO Sarah Gold, giving a consistent point of view across engagements |
| + | Services span product design through policy and regulatory design, useful for regulated or public-facing products |
| - | Team size isn't published in available sources, making capacity planning harder for large programs |
| - | Trust-and-policy specialization is a narrower fit for clients wanting pure visual or brand design |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published |
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutiques here |
| + | Clutch-recognized 'Leading UX Design Team,' plus Top Graphic Design Company nods from DesignRush and The Manifest |
| + | Grew from 1 to 150+ people while retaining a single-studio, boutique culture |
| + | Pairs product design with full software development, cutting hand-off risk |
| - | Relocated its HQ from Ukraine to Warsaw amid regional instability — worth noting for delivery-continuity planning |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the cheapest option in this list |
| - | Development-heavy focus means marginally less pure design specialization than research-only firms |
Who should choose Projects by IF?
A typical fit: public-sector or government digital service design.
A design practice built specifically around trust, regulation, and policy work for technology-enabled organizations, with clients spanning Google to the UK Government. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
A typical fit: end-to-end SaaS product design and development.
700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Projects by IF |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Fireart Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Projects by IF (Not published) vs Fireart Studio ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Projects by IF |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio
| Use case | Projects by IF fit | Fireart Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public-sector or government digital service design | Strong | Limited | Projects by IF |
| Trust-and-safety product design for a technology platform | Strong | Limited | Projects by IF |
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition.
Projects by IF (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need trust-and-safety product design for a technology platform. If your situation matches that, Projects by IF is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Projects by IF vs Fireart Studio FAQ
Is Projects by IF better than Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Projects by IF's strongest advantage: purpose-built around trust and regulation-aware design, a genuine specialty few boutiques on this list offer. Fireart Studio's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutiques here.
How do Projects by IF and Fireart Studio differ in pricing?
Projects by IF uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Projects by IF or Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Projects by IF and Fireart Studio?
Projects by IF's primary differentiator is: a design practice built specifically around trust, regulation, and policy work for technology-enabled organizations, with clients spanning Google to the UK Government. Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition. They also differ in team size (Not published vs 100–150+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Healthcare vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.