Ramotion vs Projects by IF: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Ramotion (4.0/5) edges ahead of Projects by IF (4.0/5) overall. Ramotion is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, brand identity plus product design. Projects by IF is the stronger option for Tech/public-sector, trust- and policy-aware design. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Ramotion vs Projects by IF: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Ramotion | Projects by IF |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2016 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | London, UK |
| Team size | 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) | Not published |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 | A design practice built specifically around trust, regulation, and policy work for technology-enabled organizations, with clients spanning Google to the UK Government |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, T&M | Project-based (not published) |
| Min. engagement | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, React | Figma, Miro, Adobe Creative Suite |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Financial services / fintech |
Ramotion vs Projects by IF: overview
Ramotion
Ramotion has operated out of San Francisco since 2009, later adding offices in Los Angeles and New York. Team size is a genuine point of disagreement: the firm's own site claims '70+ team experts,' while third-party employee trackers put core headcount closer to 29 (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount). What isn't disputed is the work — brand identity, UX/UI, and web/mobile app development for a client range running from early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies.
Projects by IF
Sarah Gold founded Projects by IF in London in 2016, building a strategic design practice around a specific problem: helping technology-enabled organizations design for trust at scale. That focus — spanning product and experience design, digital strategy, regulation and policy work, and technology architecture — has produced client relationships with Google, the UK Government, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, an unusual combination of big tech and public-sector work for a studio this size.
Services and capabilities: Ramotion vs Projects by IF
| Capability | Ramotion | Projects by IF |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Ramotion vs Projects by IF
| Framework / platform | Ramotion | Projects by IF |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Ramotion vs Projects by IF
| Criterion | Ramotion | Projects by IF |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time & materials | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Ramotion vs Projects by IF
| Dimension | Ramotion | Projects by IF |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup, Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company | Public-sector or government digital service design, Trust-and-safety product design for a technology platform |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Ramotion vs Projects by IF: pros and cons
| Ramotion | |
|---|---|
| + | 16 continuous years in operation since 2009 |
| + | Combines brand identity with product design and app development inside one team |
| + | Serves both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 clients, offering flexible scale |
| + | Three US offices (San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York) |
| - | Team size is genuinely disputed (company states 70+, trackers report as low as ~29) — worth clarifying before signing |
| - | $25K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) sits mid-tier, not the most accessible in this list |
| - | Broad brand-plus-product positioning trades off some depth against product-only specialists |
| Projects by IF | |
|---|---|
| + | Purpose-built around trust and regulation-aware design, a genuine specialty few boutiques on this list offer |
| + | Client list combines big tech (Google) with public-sector work (UK Government), demonstrating range within its niche |
| + | Founder-led since 2016 under CEO Sarah Gold, giving a consistent point of view across engagements |
| + | Services span product design through policy and regulatory design, useful for regulated or public-facing products |
| - | Team size isn't published in available sources, making capacity planning harder for large programs |
| - | Trust-and-policy specialization is a narrower fit for clients wanting pure visual or brand design |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published |
Who should choose Ramotion?
A typical fit: brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup.
Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Who should choose Projects by IF?
A typical fit: public-sector or government digital service design.
A design practice built specifically around trust, regulation, and policy work for technology-enabled organizations, with clients spanning Google to the UK Government. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Ramotion vs Projects by IF
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Ramotion |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Ramotion ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs Projects by IF (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Projects by IF |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Ramotion vs Projects by IF
| Use case | Ramotion fit | Projects by IF fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup | Strong | Limited | Ramotion |
| Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company | Strong | Limited | Ramotion |
| Public-sector or government digital service design | Limited | Strong | Projects by IF |
| Trust-and-safety product design for a technology platform | Limited | Strong | Projects by IF |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Ramotion vs Projects by IF
Ramotion (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500.
Projects by IF (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need trust-and-safety product design for a technology platform. If your situation matches that, Projects by IF is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Ramotion vs Projects by IF FAQ
Is Ramotion better than Projects by IF?
Ramotion (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Ramotion's strongest advantage: 16 continuous years in operation since 2009. Projects by IF's strongest advantage: purpose-built around trust and regulation-aware design, a genuine specialty few boutiques on this list offer.
How do Ramotion and Projects by IF differ in pricing?
Ramotion uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Projects by IF uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Ramotion or Projects by IF?
Ramotion is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Ramotion and Projects by IF?
Ramotion's primary differentiator is: combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. Projects by IF's primary differentiator is: a design practice built specifically around trust, regulation, and policy work for technology-enabled organizations, with clients spanning Google to the UK Government. They also differ in team size (29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) vs Not published), minimum engagement ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products vs Enterprise transformation, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.