Work & Co vs Ramotion: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Ramotion (4.0/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.8/5) overall. Ramotion is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, brand identity plus product design. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium brands, design plus production-grade engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Ramotion: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | San Francisco, CA, USA |
| Team size | 425+ | 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) that outpaces its ~425-person headcount, delivered through an engineering-heavy design-and-build model | Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Webflow, React |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Work & Co vs Ramotion: overview
Work & Co
Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo founded Work & Co in Dumbo, Brooklyn in May 2013, later opening offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. At roughly 425 people, the firm's client list — Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, Disney — punches well above its size, largely because design and front-end engineering are handled by the same team rather than separate vendors. Accenture Song acquired Work & Co in 2023.
Ramotion
Ramotion has operated out of San Francisco since 2009, later adding offices in Los Angeles and New York. Team size is a genuine point of disagreement: the firm's own site claims '70+ team experts,' while third-party employee trackers put core headcount closer to 29 (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount). What isn't disputed is the work — brand identity, UX/UI, and web/mobile app development for a client range running from early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Capability | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Criterion | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Dimension | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup, Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Ramotion: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is exceptional relative to headcount |
| + | Design and engineering under one roof cuts the hand-off risk of splitting vendors |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give real multi-region capacity |
| + | Consistent record shipping flagship consumer digital products |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, which shares a parent with the Accenture Song entry elsewhere in this list |
| - | A premium client base implies premium pricing even without a published minimum |
| - | Less vertical specialization (fintech, healthcare-specific) than boutiques built around one niche |
| Ramotion | |
|---|---|
| + | 16 continuous years in operation since 2009 |
| + | Combines brand identity with product design and app development inside one team |
| + | Serves both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 clients, offering flexible scale |
| + | Three US offices (San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York) |
| - | Team size is genuinely disputed (company states 70+, trackers report as low as ~29) — worth clarifying before signing |
| - | $25K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) sits mid-tier, not the most accessible in this list |
| - | Broad brand-plus-product positioning trades off some depth against product-only specialists |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
A client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) that outpaces its ~425-person headcount, delivered through an engineering-heavy design-and-build model. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Ramotion?
A typical fit: brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup.
Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Ramotion ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Ramotion fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company | Limited | Strong | Ramotion |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Ramotion
Ramotion (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500.
Work & Co (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need e-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering. If your situation matches that, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Ramotion FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Ramotion?
Ramotion (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is exceptional relative to headcount. Ramotion's strongest advantage: 16 continuous years in operation since 2009.
How do Work & Co and Ramotion differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Ramotion uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Ramotion?
Ramotion is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Ramotion?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) that outpaces its ~425-person headcount, delivered through an engineering-heavy design-and-build model. Ramotion's primary differentiator is: combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.