Best Product Design Firms

Excited vs Goji Labs: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Excited (4.6/5) edges ahead of Goji Labs (3.9/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for SaaS/fintech teams, top-ranked specialist, accessible rates. Goji Labs is the stronger option for Startups, entrepreneurs, nonprofits — strategy-led, accessible. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Excited vs Goji Labs: head-to-head summary

Criterion Excited Goji Labs
Founded 2018 2014
HQ Lviv, Ukraine West Hollywood / Los Angeles, CA, USA
Team size 100+ 11–50
Rating 4.6 / 5 3.9 / 5
Primary differentiator A sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only funded startups
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project, T&M
Min. engagement $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Framer, After Effects Figma, React, Swift
Industries served SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare

Excited vs Goji Labs: overview

Excited

Excited opened in Lviv, Ukraine in 2018 and has scaled to 100+ designers while holding a repeated spot among Clutch's Top 5 UX firms worldwide. Roughly 70% of its Clutch reviewers specifically name quality and creativity — an unusually direct signal for review data most firms don't get. The firm deliberately narrows to SaaS and fintech clients, covering UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, with delivery experience across 20+ countries.

Goji Labs

David Barlev and Adam Sumner founded Goji Labs in 2014 (one source says 2015), building a strategy-led firm from West Hollywood/Los Angeles that now runs 11–50 employees. The company made the 2025 Inc. 5000 list and carries 84 Clutch reviews, with deep edtech, fintech, and healthtech experience. What separates Goji from most firms here: it explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only venture-funded companies.

Services and capabilities: Excited vs Goji Labs

Capability Excited Goji Labs
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Excited vs Goji Labs

Framework / platform Excited Goji Labs
Figma
Webflow N/A N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects N/A

Pricing comparison: Excited vs Goji Labs

Criterion Excited Goji Labs
Minimum engagement $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Time & materials
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: Excited vs Goji Labs

Dimension Excited Goji Labs
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare
Best use cases SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish Nonprofit or mission-driven product design, EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Excited vs Goji Labs: pros and cons

Excited
+ Sustained Top 5 UX firm ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement
+ About 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality and creativity, a strong qualitative signal
+ Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth
+ Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach
- The claimed 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable
- Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted firms
- SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals
Goji Labs
+ Independently verified 2025 Inc. 5000 growth recognition
+ 84 Clutch reviews provide a substantial independent feedback sample
+ Explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only funded startups
+ Strategy-led approach pairs product discovery with delivery inside one team
- The 11–50 employee band is smaller than most other boutiques here, limiting capacity for very large programs
- Founding year is disputed between sources (2014 vs. 2015)
- Focus on edtech/fintech/healthtech means less depth for consumer or enterprise-only projects

Who should choose Excited?

A typical fit: SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company.

A sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.

Who should choose Goji Labs?

A typical fit: nonprofit or mission-driven product design.

A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only funded startups. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.

Decision matrix: Excited vs Goji Labs

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Excited
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Excited
Your budget is at the lower end Goji Labs
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Goji Labs
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Excited vs Goji Labs

Use case Excited fit Goji Labs fit Winner
SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company Strong Limited Excited
Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish Strong Limited Excited
Nonprofit or mission-driven product design Limited Strong Goji Labs
EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup Limited Strong Goji Labs
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Excited vs Goji Labs

Excited (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity.

Goji Labs (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup. If your situation matches that, Goji Labs is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Excited vs Goji Labs FAQ

Is Excited better than Goji Labs?

Excited (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Excited's strongest advantage: sustained Top 5 UX firm ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement. Goji Labs's strongest advantage: independently verified 2025 Inc. 5000 growth recognition.

How do Excited and Goji Labs differ in pricing?

Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Goji Labs uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Excited or Goji Labs?

Goji Labs is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Excited and Goji Labs?

Excited's primary differentiator is: a sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Goji Labs's primary differentiator is: a 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only funded startups. They also differ in team size (100+ vs 11–50), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs EdTech, Financial services / fintech).

Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.