Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of UXDA (4.3/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — perfect-rated boutique. UXDA is the stronger option for Banks/fintech, exclusively financial-services UX. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | 25+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a firm that doesn't publish its own headcount | The only firm in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, retainer |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | Financial services / fintech |
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes its own history as running "since 2014" — treated here as self-reported since it isn't independently confirmed — from Dnipro, Ukraine. Instead of a headcount, the firm calls itself a "collective of creative professionals," pointing to 500+ completed projects and a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews. Thirteen-plus international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush back that rating, spanning fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail work.
UXDA
Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda launched UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015, keeping the team deliberately small — 25+ multidisciplinary specialists in Riga, Latvia. A decade later, that narrow focus has produced 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms defined or governed across 39 countries. There's no branding or consumer-product work here; every engagement is financial-services UX, making UXDA the clearest single-vertical fintech specialist in this list.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist firms simply can't match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time |
| - | The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques |
| - | Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
A typical fit: fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work.
A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a firm that doesn't publish its own headcount. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose UXDA?
A typical fit: bank digital platform redesign.
The only firm in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs UXDA
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a firm that doesn't publish its own headcount.
UXDA (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need fintech app UX for a regulated market. If your situation matches that, UXDA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs UXDA FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than UXDA?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio's strongest advantage: 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list. UXDA's strongest advantage: exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist firms simply can't match.
How do Gapsy Studio and UXDA differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or UXDA?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and UXDA?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a firm that doesn't publish its own headcount. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only firm in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs 25+), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.