Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) edges ahead of Huge Inc (3.6/5) overall. Spaceberry Studio is the better choice for budget-conscious SaaS/AI/mobile teams, low-commitment subscription. Huge Inc is the stronger option for large brands, big firm mid-ownership-transition. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Huge Inc | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1999 | 2016 |
| HQ | Manhattan, NYC, USA (relocated from Brooklyn Oct 2025) | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | ~1,240 | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | One of the largest, longest-running digital firms in this list, now merged with Hero Digital under AEA Investors | One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract |
| Pricing model | Project-based, retainer | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, React | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Huge Inc
David Skokna, Sasha Kirovski, Gene Liebel, and Aaron Shapiro founded Huge in Brooklyn in 1999. Most of its history ran inside Interpublic Group, until AEA Investors bought the firm in December 2024 and merged it with Hero Digital; a Manhattan relocation followed in October 2025. Post-merger, the combined firm runs around 1,240 people, with engagement sizes that follow large-agency norms rather than a published rate card.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio began in 2016 as "MainCode Agency," rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020 — 2016 is used as the founding year here since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London office, the firm runs 12–50 employees depending on source, selling subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than quoting fixed-price projects — one of two subscription models in this list alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Huge Inc | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Huge Inc | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Huge Inc | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Huge Inc | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Enterprise brand and digital product redesign, Large-scale web platform modernization | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Huge Inc | |
|---|---|
| + | 26 years of enterprise digital design history and case studies |
| + | Post-merger headcount (~1,240) supports significant delivery capacity |
| + | Covers brand, product, and web design/development under one roof |
| + | Recent Hero Digital merger brings additional capabilities into the brand |
| - | Sold to private equity firm AEA Investors in December 2024 and merged with Hero Digital — a recent ownership change still settling |
| - | Long tenure inside Interpublic Group followed by a 2024 sale means less continuity than an independently owned firm |
| - | Engagement sizes aren't published, complicating budget planning for smaller teams |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Huge Inc?
A typical fit: enterprise brand and digital product redesign.
One of the largest, longest-running digital firms in this list, now merged with Hero Digital under AEA Investors. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
A typical fit: ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription.
One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Huge Inc |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Huge Inc (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Huge Inc |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Huge Inc fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise brand and digital product redesign | Strong | Limited | Huge Inc |
| Large-scale web platform modernization | Strong | Limited | Huge Inc |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract.
Huge Inc (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale web platform modernization. If your situation matches that, Huge Inc is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Huge Inc vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Huge Inc better than Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Huge Inc's strongest advantage: 26 years of enterprise digital design history and case studies. Spaceberry Studio's strongest advantage: subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here.
How do Huge Inc and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Huge Inc uses project-based, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Huge Inc or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Huge Inc and Spaceberry Studio?
Huge Inc's primary differentiator is: one of the largest, longest-running digital firms in this list, now merged with Hero Digital under AEA Investors. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (~1,240 vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.