Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Qubstudio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) overall. Qubstudio is the better choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign.. Gapsy Studio is the stronger option for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Qubstudio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| HQ | London, UK (Canary Wharf), Ukraine-based delivery team | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best for | Fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign. | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch, Webflow | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Qubstudio
Qubstudio traces to around 2006 (some sources say 2007), headquartered in London's Canary Wharf with a Ukraine-based delivery team. The firm describes roughly 70 creative professionals within a broader 51–200 employee band. Clutch's 2026 rankings place it #1 among UX/UI firms with 90+ reviews, and Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition back that up. Work spans fintech, logistics, healthcare, and EdTech, from new MVPs through enterprise-scale redesigns.
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes itself as operating 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; treated here as self-reported), based in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publish a headcount, it positions itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' behind 500+ completed projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews and 13+ international awards (Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, DesignRush) back its work across UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
Services and capabilities: Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Qubstudio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Qubstudio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Qubstudio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Qubstudio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Fintech MVP launch design, Logistics platform UX overhaul | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Qubstudio | |
|---|---|
| + | #1 UX/UI firm on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews |
| + | Independently verified via Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition |
| + | Nearly two decades of operation with a stable London HQ and Ukraine delivery team |
| + | Covers everything from MVP launches to enterprise digital transformation |
| - | Founding year is disputed between sources (2006 vs. 2007) — treated as approximate |
| - | Ukraine-based delivery team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted firms |
| - | The 51–200 directory band is wide; the company's own ~70 figure is more precise but self-reported |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
Who should choose Qubstudio?
Qubstudio is the right choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..
#1 UX/UI firm on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Qubstudio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Qubstudio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Qubstudio fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech MVP launch design | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Logistics platform UX overhaul | Strong | Limited | Qubstudio |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio
Qubstudio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. #1 UX/UI firm on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. It is best for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the better choice when fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. If your situation matches those criteria, Gapsy Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Qubstudio vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Qubstudio better than Gapsy Studio?
Qubstudio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Qubstudio is better for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign.. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
How do Qubstudio and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Qubstudio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Qubstudio or Gapsy Studio?
Qubstudio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Qubstudio and Gapsy Studio?
Qubstudio's primary differentiator is: #1 ux/ui firm on clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with red dot design award recognition on top. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. They also differ in team size (51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, Healthcare vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.