Best Product Design Firms

Ramotion vs Excited: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Excited (4.6/5) edges ahead of Ramotion (4.0/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for SaaS/fintech teams, top-ranked specialist, accessible rates. Ramotion is the stronger option for Startups/mid-market, brand identity plus product design. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Ramotion vs Excited: head-to-head summary

Criterion Ramotion Excited
Founded 2009 2018
HQ San Francisco, CA, USA Lviv, Ukraine
Team size 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) 100+
Rating 4.0 / 5 4.6 / 5
Primary differentiator Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 A sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity
Pricing model Fixed project, T&M Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Webflow, React Figma, Framer, After Effects
Industries served SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech

Ramotion vs Excited: overview

Ramotion

Ramotion has operated out of San Francisco since 2009, later adding offices in Los Angeles and New York. Team size is a genuine point of disagreement: the firm's own site claims '70+ team experts,' while third-party employee trackers put core headcount closer to 29 (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount). What isn't disputed is the work — brand identity, UX/UI, and web/mobile app development for a client range running from early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies.

Excited

Excited opened in Lviv, Ukraine in 2018 and has scaled to 100+ designers while holding a repeated spot among Clutch's Top 5 UX firms worldwide. Roughly 70% of its Clutch reviewers specifically name quality and creativity — an unusually direct signal for review data most firms don't get. The firm deliberately narrows to SaaS and fintech clients, covering UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, with delivery experience across 20+ countries.

Services and capabilities: Ramotion vs Excited

Capability Ramotion Excited
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Ramotion vs Excited

Framework / platform Ramotion Excited
Figma
Webflow N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A
Adobe Creative Suite
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects N/A

Pricing comparison: Ramotion vs Excited

Criterion Ramotion Excited
Minimum engagement $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Time & materials Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: Ramotion vs Excited

Dimension Ramotion Excited
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech
Best use cases Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup, Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Ramotion vs Excited: pros and cons

Ramotion
+ 16 continuous years in operation since 2009
+ Combines brand identity with product design and app development inside one team
+ Serves both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 clients, offering flexible scale
+ Three US offices (San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York)
- Team size is genuinely disputed (company states 70+, trackers report as low as ~29) — worth clarifying before signing
- $25K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) sits mid-tier, not the most accessible in this list
- Broad brand-plus-product positioning trades off some depth against product-only specialists
Excited
+ Sustained Top 5 UX firm ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement
+ About 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality and creativity, a strong qualitative signal
+ Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth
+ Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach
- The claimed 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable
- Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted firms
- SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals

Who should choose Ramotion?

A typical fit: brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup.

Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.

Who should choose Excited?

A typical fit: SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company.

A sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.

Decision matrix: Ramotion vs Excited

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Ramotion
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Excited
Your budget is at the lower end Excited
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Ramotion
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Ramotion vs Excited

Use case Ramotion fit Excited fit Winner
Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup Strong Strong Both equally
Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company Strong Limited Ramotion
SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company Limited Strong Excited
Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish Limited Strong Excited
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Ramotion vs Excited

Excited (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity.

Ramotion (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company. If your situation matches that, Ramotion is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Ramotion vs Excited FAQ

Is Ramotion better than Excited?

Excited (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Ramotion's strongest advantage: 16 continuous years in operation since 2009. Excited's strongest advantage: sustained Top 5 UX firm ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement.

How do Ramotion and Excited differ in pricing?

Ramotion uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Ramotion or Excited?

Ramotion is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Ramotion and Excited?

Ramotion's primary differentiator is: combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. Excited's primary differentiator is: a sustained Top 5 global UX firm ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. They also differ in team size (29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) vs 100+), minimum engagement ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).

Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.