SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
SYPartners (3.9/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. SYPartners is the better choice for large orgs, design within culture/strategy transformation. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS/AI/mobile teams, low-commitment subscription. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | SYPartners | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2016 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA (also New York, Los Angeles, and Abu Dhabi) | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | ~196 | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A transformation consultancy — not a pure product-design shop — with a client list (Obama Foundation, Starbucks, IBM, Airbnb) most boutiques on this list can't approach | One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract |
| Pricing model | Project-based (not published) | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Miro | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
SYPartners
Founded in 1994 and headquartered across San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, and Abu Dhabi, SYPartners runs about 196 people focused on leadership, strategy, and culture transformation — with design as one tool among several rather than the sole offering. Client relationships span AARP, Airbnb, BlackRock, IBM, the Obama Foundation, Pfizer, and Starbucks, including work on Starbucks' 2018 anti-bias training. Clients looking for pure interface design work should look elsewhere on this list; SYPartners is better understood as a transformation consultancy that happens to use design as a primary tool.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio began in 2016 as "MainCode Agency," rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020 — 2016 is used as the founding year here since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London office, the firm runs 12–50 employees depending on source, selling subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than quoting fixed-price projects — one of two subscription models in this list alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | SYPartners | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | SYPartners | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | SYPartners | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | SYPartners | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Enterprise leadership or culture transformation with a design component, Large organization change management paired with product or brand design | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| SYPartners | |
|---|---|
| + | Three decades of continuous operation since 1994 |
| + | Client list (Obama Foundation, Starbucks, IBM, Airbnb, BlackRock, Pfizer) reflects work at the highest levels of large organizations |
| + | 196-person team supports substantial multi-workstream engagements |
| + | Four-office footprint (San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, Abu Dhabi) supports large, distributed programs |
| - | Positioned around leadership and culture transformation, not pure product/UI design — a mismatch for clients wanting only interface work |
| - | Enterprise-scale client list implies enterprise-level pricing, though no minimum is published |
| - | Broad transformation-consulting scope means less concentrated product-design specialization than boutiques built around it |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose SYPartners?
A typical fit: enterprise leadership or culture transformation with a design component.
A transformation consultancy — not a pure product-design shop — with a client list (Obama Foundation, Starbucks, IBM, Airbnb) most boutiques on this list can't approach. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
A typical fit: ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription.
One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | SYPartners |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | SYPartners |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: SYPartners (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | SYPartners |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | SYPartners fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise leadership or culture transformation with a design component | Strong | Limited | SYPartners |
| Large organization change management paired with product or brand design | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio
SYPartners (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A transformation consultancy — not a pure product-design shop — with a client list (Obama Foundation, Starbucks, IBM, Airbnb) most boutiques on this list can't approach.
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team. If your situation matches that, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
SYPartners vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is SYPartners better than Spaceberry Studio?
SYPartners (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. SYPartners's strongest advantage: three decades of continuous operation since 1994. Spaceberry Studio's strongest advantage: subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here.
How do SYPartners and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
SYPartners uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: SYPartners or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between SYPartners and Spaceberry Studio?
SYPartners's primary differentiator is: a transformation consultancy — not a pure product-design shop — with a client list (Obama Foundation, Starbucks, IBM, Airbnb) most boutiques on this list can't approach. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (~196 vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.